Flagship review · Deposition summaries and medical chronologies

CaseMark Review (2026): AI Depo Summaries and Medical Chronologies

CaseMark has moved from per-summary pricing to a workspace subscription with a dollar-based usage allowance. How fast that allowance burns depends on the size of your files.

By The AI Tools For Law team

How we research: Researched from vendor documentation, pricing pages, contract terms and user sentiment.

  • 5 min read
  • 11 chapters

Last updated Prices and details checked How we reviewEditorial independence

Verdict at a glance

Recommended for

Litigators and injury and medical-malpractice teams that need deposition summaries and medical chronologies on demand.

Bottom line

A practical option for litigators who need depo summaries and medical chronologies on demand. Run a typical matter during the trial to see what it really costs, set a spend limit, and check every cite.

An AI legal workspace (Para) for research, document review, drafting and AI chat, with structured deliverables: deposition summaries in page-line, narrative and analysis formats, and medical chronologies cited to the records. Pro is $100 per user a month with $100 of included AI usage, billed monthly with no annual commitment. Optional on-demand usage beyond the allowance carries a 30% premium. Its terms say it doesn't use your data to train its AI models.

Not for

Firms that need a contractual uptime commitment, and teams handling health records that can't move to Enterprise for a BAA.

Pricing from

$100/user/month Pro with $100 of included AI usage (casemark.com/pricing, checked 2026-10-15)

Pros

  • Page-line, narrative and analysis deposition summaries (casemark.com)
  • Medical chronologies cited to the records (casemark.com)
  • Monthly billing with no annual commitment on Pro (casemark.com/pricing)
  • Terms say your data isn't used to train its AI models (casemark.com/terms-of-service)

Cons

  • Included usage is a dollar allowance that burns by task scope
  • Usage beyond the allowance costs 30% more
  • No uptime guarantee
  • BAA only on Enterprise, from $200 per user a month

CaseMark directory listing → · Vendor site ↗

Quick answer

Bottom line: CaseMark is for litigators and litigation teams that need first-draft deposition summaries and medical chronologies on demand. CaseMark lists Pro at $100 per user a month, billed monthly with no annual commitment, including $100 of AI usage, and says usage beyond that allowance costs 30% more (vendor claims, checked October 15, 2026). There's a 14-day trial with $20 of usage credit, and a card is required before your first assignment. The trap: the allowance is in dollars, not documents, and the size of each task sets how fast it burns, so a few big files can push you into the higher-priced extra usage.

What this means for you: run a real deposition through the trial to see what it costs, set a team spend limit, and check every cite against the transcript.

In this review (14)
  1. At a glance
  2. What does CaseMark actually do?
  3. How much does CaseMark cost?
  4. What are CaseMark's terms?
  5. What do users say about CaseMark?
  6. Buyer tips before you sign
  7. Pros and cons
  8. How does CaseMark compare?
  9. Who should use CaseMark?
  10. FAQ
  11. Is any of this sponsored?
  12. Sources (all accessed 2026-10-15)
  13. Alternatives
  14. How we reviewed

The AI Tools For Law team researched this review from CaseMark's pricing page and terms of service, plus our reading of public feedback on AI deposition summaries. Everything was checked October 15, 2026. Prices and terms change, so confirm with CaseMark before you buy.

Disclosure: Some listings on AI Tools For Law may be sponsored or include affiliate or referral links. Paid placements are always labeled "Sponsored," and payment never changes our verdicts. CaseMark hasn't paid for this review. Nothing here is legal advice.

What does CaseMark actually do?#

  • Para: research, document review, drafts and AI chat, with what CaseMark calls 880+ legal agent skills.
  • Deposition summaries in page-line, narrative and analysis formats. A page-line summary points each point back to the transcript page and line it came from.
  • Medical chronologies: cited timelines built from medical records.
  • Transcription and translation: audio and video transcription, and reviewable translated working copies.
  • Source: a white-label product for court reporting and litigation support firms, with a branded client portal.

What this means for you: CaseMark turns long transcripts and record sets into first-draft work product. Someone still has to check it against the source.

How much does CaseMark cost?#

From CaseMark's pricing page (vendor claims, checked October 15, 2026):

Included usage is a dollar allowance, and CaseMark says task scope determines how much each job uses. CaseMark says eligible paid accounts can turn on prepaid on-demand usage beyond the allowance at a 30% premium, with a top-up amount and a team spend limit.

What are CaseMark's terms?#

From CaseMark's terms of service, paraphrased:

  • Training: CaseMark says it doesn't use your data to train its AI models or sell it to third parties. Its license to your data is limited to providing the service.
  • Refunds: prepaid and pay-as-you-go amounts are non-refundable.
  • Price changes: changes to a paid subscription take effect next term, with written notice at least 60 days before the term ends.
  • Reliability: no specific uptime guarantee, and service can be suspended without notice for maintenance or security.
  • Trials: one free trial per person.
  • Accuracy: you're responsible for checking AI output.

What do users say about CaseMark?#

Lawyers discussing AI deposition summaries in general, not CaseMark specifically, describe them as useful first drafts but warn that citations, nuance and missed issues need checking. CaseMark doesn't disclose a human quality-review step, so plan on reviewing every summary yourself.

Buyer tips before you sign#

  1. Test real files during the trial to see the actual burn rate.
  2. Set a team spend limit before enabling on-demand usage.
  3. Spot-check page-line cites against the transcript on every summary.
  4. Ask whether per-summary pay-as-you-go is still offered if you're an occasional user. The terms still describe it, but the pricing page leads with subscriptions (confirm with CaseMark).
  5. Plan for Enterprise if you need a BAA.

Pros and cons#

Pros

  • Page-line depo summaries.
  • Cited medical chronologies.
  • No annual commitment on Pro.
  • No training on your data.

Cons

  • Usage burn varies by file.
  • 30% premium on extra usage.
  • No uptime guarantee.
  • BAA only on Enterprise.

How does CaseMark compare?#

Supio and EvenUp focus on personal injury case work, including medical records and demand preparation. Steno is a court reporting company with transcript and deposition tools.

Who should use CaseMark?#

FAQ#

How much does CaseMark cost?#

CaseMark lists Pro at $100 per user a month with $100 of included AI usage; Teams and Enterprise are quoted (vendor pricing, checked October 15, 2026).

What happens if I use more than my allowance?#

CaseMark says eligible paid accounts can enable prepaid on-demand usage at a 30% premium, with a top-up amount and a spend limit.

Does CaseMark train AI on my files?#

Its terms say it doesn't use your data to train its AI models or sell it to third parties.

Is there a free trial?#

Yes. A 14-day trial with $20 of usage credit; a card is required before your first assignment.

Is any of this sponsored?#

No. If that changes, the listing will be labeled "Sponsored," and payment won't change the verdict.

Sources (all accessed 2026-10-15)#

AI Tools For Law is not a law firm and doesn't provide legal advice. Using this site doesn't create an attorney-client relationship.

Alternatives to CaseMark#

Transcription & Depositions

Steno

Court reporting agency with remote depositions on Zoom, videography, AI transcript tools, Clio and Litify integrations, and DelayPay deferred payment.

Best forLitigation firms that want to defer deposition costs until the case concludes.

How we reviewed

Researched from vendor documentation, pricing pages and user sentiment. Prices and details were last checked on . Sources are cited inline next to each claim and listed in the Sources section above.

How we review · Editorial independence and disclosure · Corrections: hello@aitoolsforlaw.ai